I freaking love Batman Dad! I also love how his family put up with it.
I CANT BREATHE
I freaking love Batman Dad! I also love how his family put up with it.
I CANT BREATHE
Oh hey it’s back on my dash perfect! I was just thinking of this the other day!
OHOHOHO wow the Korean alphabet is awesome. The people who designed it were geniuses and were obviously incredibly schooled in the morphology and phonology of their language. HNNGGG
여러분 모두 한국어 쓰세요 한국어 좋음
한국어, 한글은 보면 맨날쓰는거지만 볼수록,쓸수록 예뻐요..참으로 곱구나’3’♥
짱 이쁜 한국어 쓰세요 여러분
신기하게 가르치는군요 보고 신기했다
IT WASN’T JUST ANY OLD DUDE WHO DECIDED, “HEY I WANT TO CREATE A KOREAN ALPHABET.”
IT WAS KING SEJONG, WHO ORDERED HIS ROYAL SCHOLARS TO CREATE THIS ALPHABET SO READING AND WRITING COULD BE ACCESSIBLE TO EVERYONE, EVEN THE PEASANTS. IT WAS PURPOSELY DESIGNED TO BE EASY TO LEARN.
SO SHOUT OUT TO KING SEJONG, WHO REALIZED BEFORE MANY OTHERS THE IMPORTANCE OF UNIVERSAL LITERACY.
YOU GO KING SEJONG, FOUR FOR YOU KING SEJONG
This doesn’t even scratch the surface on how intuitive the Korean written language is. King Sejong was an amazing linguist and if you want to know why, you can ask me.
Michael Lee on animating Frozen
So that’s their (blatantly misogynistic) excuse for scrapping all but two of the female characters; that they’re too hard to animate? Those emotional female characters, they’re all the same, right? Here’s a hint: their “femaleness” isn’t what’s making them indistinguishable.
Frozen keeps getting better and better.
You morons do realize that less than ten years ago, it was considered next to IMPOSSIBLE to animate HAIR with CGI? I mean, ANY type of hair. When Pixar was making the Incredibles, they were so worried they wouldn’t be able to properly animate Violet, and went on and on about how her hair was so ridiculously hard to animate. VIOLET’S HAIR.
They had to develop and create entirely new programs to animate Rapunzel. Those programs are brand new, literally less than 4-5 years old. It takes TIME to develop new animation techniques, especially in a field of animation that is so new.
And you wonder why the protagonists of Frozen look so similar to Rapunzel. It’s because Rapunzel is their baseline. She’s their first big CGI female character (the only other CGI films Disney had done before Tangled were Treasure Planet, a animation-CGI hybrid, Chicken Little, Meet the Robinsons, and Bolt). She’s their first major CGI project with the technology they used in Tangled and Frozen. It takes Pixar literally YEARS to create each new project that they do. And you’ll notice, that the only Pixar character to have significant amounts of hair since Violet was Merida, and they had to develop like three COMPLETELY NEW programs to animate her hair.
Basically, this stuff takes time and money to develop, and stylistically, it should not come as a surprise to anyone that Anna looks similar to Rapunzel, given that Disney often uses the same default facial structure from decade to decade (Wendy and Alice, Aurora and Anita, Ariel and Belle, etc) while their new animation style is in development.
I swear, it’s like you people have no clue how animation actually works, or how freaking ridiculously hard it actually is. Show some respect, please.
I’m going to reblog myself to add some context.
This is the article that the quote is from. The quote is unattributed.
Also included in this same article are these gems:
"Depending on the shot, it can take up to 4,000 computers and 30 hours just to complete one frame."
"Just in effects alone, it took over 50 people to make the the scene of Elsa building her ice palace during her musical number. According to the directors, it took “forever” to render."
"One of the challenges of Frozen was that the TD department had to populate the entire kingdom with people. In this case, the department ended up building 312 character rigs, 245 cloth rigs, and 63 hair rigs. It’s more rigs the department has build than any of the other Disney films.
(remember how I said earlier that the animators talked loads about animating Rapunzel’s hair, body, and face, and how they basically created the programs they animated Tangled with from scratch? Yeah….)
"To cope with Anna and Elsa’s challenging Scandinavian hair braid style, the TD department built a new software called Tonic, which harks back to the hold barbershop days. Tonic used hair volumes and clumps, which would help build the strands and translate it into the vision. How the hair fell into place or if the character “had a bad hair day” helped the animators get an idea of how hair would work."
The TD Department approached the cloths from a real world perspective. Using a pattern based approach. The team built new software called Flourish to capture the sheer, stretch, and gravity in a more convincing way so they can best represent silks, wools, and other clothing based materials. For example, by adding motions to a horses’ stirrups or tassels, they can dictate its behavior or the way it moves.
"The effects team were even conscious of how the wind would flow through hair and cloth. A variety of controlled simulations were done with the strength and length of the wind varying."
"Acting coaches were brought in to help animators create major and subtle character movements. So when you see Anna bite her lip, or Elsa’s diaphragm move, this is something both Kristen Bell and Idina Menzel, respectively, do in real life. Basically if it made it more believable, the animators put that in.”
…have fun guys.
First Cars, then Planes, now… Boats.
leaked designs for the next 6 disney princesses
ugh I’m sorry buit this just ticks me off because I know this has to do with Anna from “Frozen” Looking like Rapunzel but omg seriously?
Ana doesn’t look THAT much liek Rapunzel! Like— damn!
Their eye shapes are different, Anna has a smaller nose, and it concaves inward more, her face is rounder, Rapunzel has more of a jaw!
Yes— they do look similar, but so what? People look similar. That’s just how things are! But this is ridiculous. It just makes me mad that people are getting all up and frumpy about this. I don’t know, maybe it’s because I want to work for disney, but it just makes me mad.
okay I don’t usually reply to these sorts of posts but the whole “THEY’RE DIFFERENT REALLY” thing is exhausting so I’m for once gonna speak my mind on the matter.
It’s not about the fact that Anna has a “smaller nose and slightly rounder face and OH MY GOD BLUE EYES AND SLIGHTLY DARKER HAIR” it’s about the fact that Disney CAN but it DOESN’T.
What do I mean by this? Let’s take a look at the official Disney Princess lineup why don’t we.
There we see a total of 11 Princesses, 7 out of which are white (and front and center mind you) and 4 WOC. Disney CAN include more WOC in their movies, Ana could’ve been any ethnicity, any body type, any ANYTHING, but instead she’s a slightly modified version of Rapunzel. Disney CAN do it, but it doesn’t.
Where’s a fat princess? Where’s a latina princess? And don’t even tell me that THIS ABOMINATION is supposed to be a representation of my community because I can’t even begin on THAT subject Where’s ANYTHING but another stereotypical white princess? When you have something as iconic as the Disney Princesses that all little kids grow up looking at, you must be careful and understand that representation is crucial. For example how come there’s 7 white princesses but only 1 black? Why can’t there be 2, or 3, or 7 for that matter?
Or someone like Mulan, yeah she’s a Chinese princess, but what about the rest of east asians? Are they all supposed to identify with the Chinese princess?
It’s not about Anna looking slightly different than Rapunzel, it’s about misrepresentation. Women all over the world come in all sizes, shapes and colors, yet Disney princesses come in predominantly white colors and all the same shape and size. NOT TO MENTION THAT WOC Princesses usually get WAY less merchandise and representation than the white princesses, and the movies for the WOC princesses, all touch very controversial topics and perpetrate stereotypes about POC. So please, understand that it’s not “being anal” about Disney’s character design choices, it’s being really fucking done and tired about Disney’s character design choices.
What’s kinda interesting is if you think about it on the basest of terms, it’s kinda like people complaining that a popular artists only draws kawaii tiny anime girls and needs more variety.
This is actually an age-old character design problem that’s exacerbated by 3D.
We haven’t really nailed 3D animation yet, and it’s still pretty limiting in regards to things like the uncanny valley. We have to be cartoony, but since the objects have to exist in 3D space with textures and real lighting, it would look totally out of place if the characters were too stylized. The result is a very narrow spectrum of what looks good in 3D. Even Pixar struggles with this, but it’s especially evident in studios of less renown.
These are major characters from various 3D movies released over the last 5 years. They all look the same. Nice smooth oval face, small rounded nose, and large eyes like rounded lemon wedges. If you told me that these were all designed by the same person I would believe it. This similarity is due to to the small spectrum of what looks good in 3D.
“But why not go super stylized? There are films where the main character has a wacky and very different design!”
The answer to that lies in the art of character design itself. Characters with those designs are always over the top, true characters. You are meant to laugh at their antics, or see them as evil, or whatever the design presents. We are not meant to connect with them on a level where we see ourselves in their shoes, and sympathize with them as main characters.
As humans we have a very limited range of visual traits that we subconsciously make a connection with. That is why character design for protagonists is often bland in comparison to the supporting cast- the more unique you make them the less the audience will sympathize with them. Again I stress that this is an unconscious phenomenon, but it has been proven and used to the advantage of any professional character designer out there.
Hotel Transylvania has characters by Genndy Tartakovsky, originally a 2D animator, so it suffers less from the boring 3D design problem. Dracula, in the center there, may be the “main character” and have a unique design, but he is a funny caricature who is meant to entertain us. The two who we are meant to connect with, who carry the emotional plot of the movie and serve as gateways to the world, are the two teenagers who follow the same 3D design template as the protagonists in every other 3D movie.
We naturally prefer attractive people (look at hollywood) and those who appear similar to ourselves for evolutionary breeding purposes. It makes more sense to cast a wide net then to pinpoint increasingly specific races and ethnicities and risk alienating everyone else. And I can’t really blame them for doing this. Of course it’s good to have plenty of diversity in your movie lineup, but you also want to draw as few lines of possible between an audience member and the character.
Calling for a princess of every different race and ethnicity is just silly. If a little Korean girl can’t connect with Mulan because she’s Chinese, or Cinderella because she’s British, that’s a problem with the girl, not the movie. I have never not been able to sympathize with a character because they’re black, or a woman, or a talking dog. I want to see all peoples represented fairly, and whitewashing is not something that should happen. However arguing that the next princess should be X race so that people of X race can identify with her is flawed thinking. In that case I call for the next princess to be a short Scottish-Polish American male with an interest in art and science, because I am incapable of enjoying a movie unless my identity is pasted onto the screen. Damn is it ever hard to find a movie I like.
TLDR; Disney isn’t doing this because they’re sexist or racist. They’re using a strategy to ensure as many people can put themselves in the shoes of a princess as possible. It isn’t their fault, it’s just the way our brain works. We’ve only noticed the great similarity because the limitations of 3D animation have really brought it out. I don’t want whitewashing, but if you need your own race to be a Disney princess in order to enjoy the movie… you’re probably a bit racist yourself.
this is THE most perfect thing I’ve ever read^^^^
I applaude you
I want you all to read this and read it real good
For some reason the universe has found it necessary to test me and push all my limits lately… Maybe it’s some kind of Karma? If so, I would like a hint as to what I have done to get all this shit piled up in the last month… 1) Work not putting me on the schedule for three weeks…2. A close family friend dyeing in a car accident. 3. Only a few short days later I get news that my cousin has passed. 4. My Jeep is vandalized. 5. Finding out that I have bed bugs at 5am this morning. If there was a god as so many believe…well that’s crazy because a god, one such as great as people make him or her out to be wouldn’t sit there and watch, or even plan and take these beautiful souls from the earth. From their families and babies. Our friend was married to a Navy Sea-man. They had two wonderful sons and she did everything she could for them.She loved them and everyone loved her. She was kind and sweet and didn’t deserve to go as she did, she didn’t deserve to go at such a young age. My cousin had a heart condition and couldn’t afford to get help for it because all her efforts went to take care of her beautiful daughter she was raising on her own with the help of her mother. Both wonderful and giving beings. R.I.P You will both be missed dearly.
Bringing Sexy Back
A comic about me not being sexy. All real experiences how fun!
Rape isn’t about uncontrollable sexual desire. You only have to listen in on a Call of Duty game to see that. When that kid crows, “I raped you!”, he’s not calling the other guy sexy; he’s saying he defeated him, dominated him, humiliated him. That’s what rape is about, and that should scare you.
gonna reblog this till I stop tumbling